| thatfangirl ( @ 2009-03-17 00:11:00 |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Entry tags: | comics:alan moore, comics:dc, indiana jones |
Talkin' 'bout Watchmen
"There is something about the quality of comics that makes things possible that you couldn't do in any other medium," [Moore] says, with just a hint of the exasperated schoolteacher. "Things that we did in Watchmen on paper could be frankly horrible or sensationalist or unpleasant if you were to interpret them literally through the medium of cinema. When it's just lines on paper, the reader is in control of the experience—it's a tableau vivant. And that gives it the necessary distance. It's not the same when you're being dragged through it at 24 frames per second."And if you talk to me about reading comics, I will invariably bring up what you create between the panels, or what Scott McCloud calls "blood in the gutter," which is all to say that Zack Snyder's Watchmen had, I thought, entirely too much blood and not enough inference.— Alan Moore: An Extraordinary Gentleman, The Guardian
It might have been because the naysayers were right, and Watchmen doesn't work as anything but a comic book, and especially not as a movie, a medium that's in some ways the antithesis of the comic form. As anyone who's been to my blog or been stuck alone with me after I've had too many drinks knows, I'm a big believer in the work of Marshall McLuhan, who labeled movies a "hot" medium (figuratively speaking, they're of a high resolution—the film provides every last detail) and comics a "cool" one (they demand that you fill in sound and movement yourself, in your brain).